The economic and political links within the European Union are a prolific theme, with a multitude of specialized ghostwriters working on them.
Europe has many faces. Laughing, friendly and nice – if you look at the brochures that the Union publishes for your self-expression. But there are also faces that they do not easily show. Because behind the cheerful facade of international understanding and European unity lurking conflicts of interests lurk, which must first be understood before they are made the subject of a scientific work.
Theme Mine Europe
Anyone who deals with the Union as a political actor or as a supranational level of government soon realizes that there is a great deal of discrepancy between the outward appearance of concord and the actual circumstances:
Internal conflicts prevail, market shares, lobbyists strive for influence, and the Union suffers from a flagrant democratic deficit, especially as there is no European nation state and the different electoral systems and the complex negotiation processes carried out behind closed doors lead to inequality also between formally equal partners prevails.
Constant change – constant research
Brexit has raised new questions: how can exit from the Union be designed in such a way that both sides avoid disadvantages? What regulation should apply if a strong regional independence movement is established in a member state that wants to leave the national network while remaining a member of the EU?
The EU, with its complex bureaucratic ramifications and confusing allocation of powers, is certainly not an easy topic – even for science. Anyone writing a thesis on the topic can get help from professional ghostwriters who have been working on the topic for many years. In this way, clarity can be gained about the nature of the Union, its organs and history, its structures, processes and interests.
Theories of European integration
Above all, the history of the European Union is the story of its integration. There are different views on causes and effects.
It is hard to deny that the activities of the European Union, more specifically its institutions, have many effects on the lives of citizens; From the famous (now abolished) determination of cucumber curvature to the big issues of free movement and international crime fighting.
Integration as cooperation
Anyone who takes the trouble to consider the process of European integration far away from the daily political success stories or accusations will find that this is a very complex field: in some areas, state sovereignty is restricted in favor of European solutions and defended in others the states intensify their rights.
For the European Union, the concept of integration means first of all the increased cooperation which first produces the supra-state institutions. In the process, states are adapting to the new legal requirements imposed by the Union.
Theories of European integration include, on the one hand, functionalism or neofunctionalism, which above all see benefit for the participating states as a reason for the increasing cooperation. The second great theory of European integration is liberal intergovernmentalism.
It assumes that integration will progress only insofar as this is explicitly desired by national governments, while supranational institutions such as the EU Commission and the Court of Justice play only a minor role.
In addition, there are other approaches that examine, for example, the repercussions of integration on states or the negotiation mechanisms that operate between the different levels of government.
For many students of the first semester, the occupation with the European Union is characterized above all by their complexity: the coexistence of numerous institutions, the inscrutable negotiation processes and decision-making mechanisms shape the picture.
Nevertheless, a more intensive occupation with the Union is worthwhile. And if you want, you can also have your texts reviewed and improved by academic ghostwriters.